By: Chioma Madonna Ndukwu
Finnish authorities have explained why Simon Ekpa, a controversial pro-Biafra leader, should not be granted bail. According to Mikko Laaksonen, Senior Detective Superintendent at Finland’s National Bureau of Investigation, “Finnish criminal procedure/coercive measures do not recognise bail procedure,” emphasizing that Ekpa’s charges are too serious for such a decision.
Ekpa, arrested on November 21, 2024, faces accusations of inciting violence and financing terrorism in Nigeria. Finnish authorities also claim he illegally raised funds for unlawful purposes between 2021 and 2024.
Ekpa, who leads the “Autopilot” faction of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has been linked to violent attacks in southeastern Nigeria, although IPOB denies any involvement. His arrest has sparked debate, with the IPOB faction loyal to Nnamdi Kanu distancing themselves from him.
Finnish law requires Ekpa to remain in custody until his trial in May 2025, as his actions are considered to pose a serious threat.
While Finland’s legal process must be respected, the case raises deeper questions about the fine line between activism and terrorism. Ekpa’s cause may be political, but his alleged actions could justify the strict legal measures taken against him.
