By Ollus Ndomu
The ECOWAS Court of Justice has dismissed a high-profile legal challenge seeking to repeal Nigeria’s vagrancy laws, citing lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of identifiable victims.
In a ruling delivered by a three-member panel, the West African regional court said the applicants—led by a Nigerian civil society organization—failed to establish concrete instances where individuals’ rights were violated under the contested statutes. The judges held that without demonstrating specific harm to named victims, the court could not proceed to hear the substantive case.
The suit, filed in 2021, sought to challenge long-standing Nigerian laws that criminalize acts often associated with destitution, such as street wandering, loitering, and begging. The civil society group argued these laws disproportionately affect the poor and homeless and violate a catalogue of human rights enshrined in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, including the right to dignity, freedom of movement, and protection from discrimination.
“The enforcement of these colonial-era laws continues to target marginalized populations, entrenching cycles of poverty and state-sanctioned exclusion,” the applicants said in their original filing.
However, the court stressed that it cannot adjudicate on broad or abstract human rights concerns without establishing a direct and personal impact on identifiable individuals.
Human rights advocates have expressed disappointment with the ruling, warning that the court’s narrow procedural interpretation risks insulating systemic injustices from regional scrutiny. “The failure to recognize structural harms in this case is a setback,” said Ogechi Okafor, a legal advocate for socio-economic rights in West Africa. “We cannot afford to let technicalities override justice for vulnerable populations.”
Vagrancy laws in Nigeria date back to colonial times and have long been criticized by rights groups for enabling arbitrary arrests and discriminatory policing, particularly in urban centers. Although there have been national conversations around reform, legislative inertia and institutional resistance have kept the laws largely intact.
The civil society group behind the suit has vowed to continue pushing for reform through both national litigation and advocacy. “This is only a delay—not a defeat,” a spokesperson said. “We are considering fresh filings that will meet the evidentiary requirements outlined by the court.”
As debates over poverty, justice, and human rights continue to shape Nigeria’s legal landscape, the ruling underscores a deeper tension: how to balance procedural rigor with the urgent realities of those whose lives are criminalized for being poor.
