Setting the Zambian Record Straight: President Hichilema’s Appointments Are Not Tribal

By Ollus Ndomu

The Zambian opposition has persistently accused President Hakainde Hichilema of tribalism in his appointments, a narrative that is not only misleading but also divisive. While it is essential to hold the president accountable where he may be failing, invoking tribalism as a critique of his appointments is neither accurate nor constructive. A closer look at the appointments of ambassadors and high commissioners by President Hichilema illustrates a diverse representation that transcends tribal lines.

Here is a comprehensive list of some of President Hichilema’s diplomatic appointments:

1. Ethiopia – Ambassador Sakala
2. Italy – Ambassador Kondolo
3. Australia – High Commissioner Munshya
4. Mozambique – High Commissioner Chirwa
5. South Korea – Ambassador Banda
6. Turkey – Ambassador Sikazwe
7. Botswana – High Commissioner Chisanga
8. Malawi – High Commissioner Kaunda
9. Germany – Ambassador Chibesakunda
10. Sweden – Ambassador Lundwe
11. India – High Commissioner Chanda
12. Tanzania – High Commissioner Jere
13. France – Ambassador Mulenga
14. Malaysia – High Commissioner Mumba
15. New York – Ambassador Milambo
16. Washington – Ambassador Kanyama
17. South Africa – High Commissioner Monze
18. Brazil – Ambassador Michelo
19. United Kingdom – High Commissioner Mazoka
20. DR Congo – Ambassador Kosita
21. Egypt – Ambassador Lubaya
22. Belgium – Ambassador Mundanda
23. Saudi Arabia – Ambassador Mulima
24. Zimbabwe – Ambassador Livune
25. Ghana – High Commissioner Mahongo
26. Nigeria – High Commissioner Imbuwa
27. Canada – High Commissioner Shepande
28. Switzerland – Ambassador Tembo
29. Namibia – High Commissioner Katuka
30. Japan – Ambassador Mulimbika
31. China – Ambassador Zyuulu

This list clearly demonstrates a geographical and tribal diversity that defies the opposition’s claims. The individuals appointed come from various provinces and tribal backgrounds, representing the rich tapestry of Zambia’s ethnic composition.

Moreover, the accusation of tribalism undermines the president’s efforts to promote unity and national development. It is important to focus on the qualifications and competencies of these appointees, rather than their tribal affiliations. This ensures that the best individuals are chosen to represent Zambia on the global stage, fostering international relations and advancing national interests.

Criticism of a sitting president is a vital part of any democracy. However, it should be grounded in facts and constructive arguments rather than baseless claims of tribalism. Such accusations only serve to sow discord and detract from the real issues at hand.

Overall, President Hichilema’s appointments should be evaluated on their merit, experience, and ability to perform their duties effectively. The list of appointments reflects a deliberate effort to include diverse voices and perspectives, reinforcing the principle of “One Zambia, One Nation.” It is time to move past divisive rhetoric and work together towards building a more inclusive and prosperous Zambia.

About The Author

Ollus Ndhomu

See author's posts